The U.S.-China military scorecard : forces, geography, and the evolving balance of power, 1996-2017 / Eric Heginbotham ... [and thirteen others].
2015
UA835
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Linked e-resources
Linked Resource
Linked Resource
Details
Title
The U.S.-China military scorecard : forces, geography, and the evolving balance of power, 1996-2017 / Eric Heginbotham ... [and thirteen others].
Author
ISBN
9780833082275 (epub)
0833082272
9780833082282 (prc)
0833082280
9780833082299 (ebook pdf)
0833082299
9780833082190 (pbk. : alk. paper)
0833082272
9780833082282 (prc)
0833082280
9780833082299 (ebook pdf)
0833082299
9780833082190 (pbk. : alk. paper)
Published
Santa Monica, CA : RAND, [2015]
Language
English
Description
1 online resource
Call Number
UA835
System Control No.
(OCoLC)919202464
Summary
"Over the past two decades, China's People's Liberation Army has transformed itself from a large but antiquated force into a capable, modern military. Its technology and operational proficiency still lag behind those of the United States, but it has rapidly narrowed the gap. Moreover, China enjoys the advantage of proximity in most plausible conflict scenarios, and geographical advantage would likely neutralize many U.S. military strengths. A sound understanding of regional military issues -- including forces, geography, and the evolving balance of power -- will be essential for establishing appropriate U.S. political and military policies in Asia. This RAND study analyzes the development of respective Chinese and U.S. military capabilities in ten categories of military operations across two scenarios, one centered on Taiwan and one on the Spratly Islands. The analysis is presented in ten scorecards that assess military capabilities as they have evolved over four snapshot years: 1996, 2003, 2010, and 2017. The results show that China is not close to catching up to the United States in terms of aggregate capabilities, but also that it does not need to catch up to challenge the United States on its immediate periphery. Furthermore, although China's ability to project power to more distant locations remains limited, its reach is growing, and in the future U.S. military dominance is likely to be challenged at greater distances from China's coast. To maintain robust defense and deterrence capabilities in an era of fiscal constraints, the United States will need to ensure that its own operational concepts, procurement, and diplomacy anticipate future developments in Chinese military capabilities."--Back cover.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references.
Formatted Contents Note
Introduction
Different paths: Chinese and U.S. military development, 1996-2017
Scorecard 1: Chinese capability to attack air bases
Scorecard 2: air campaigns over Taiwan and the Spratly Islands
Scorecard 3: U.S. penetration of Chinese airspace
Scorecard 4: U.S. capability to attack Chinese air bases
Scorecard 5: Chinese anti-surface warfare
Scorecard 6: U.S. anti-surface warfare capabilities versus Chinese naval ships
Scorecard 7: U.S. counterspace capabilities versus Chinese space systems
Scorecard 8: Chinese counterspace capabilities versus U.S. space systems
Scorecard 9: U.S. and Chinese cyberwarfare capabilities
Scorecard 10: U.S. and Chinese strategic nuclear stability
The receding frontier of U.S. dominance
Implications and recommendations
Different paths: Chinese and U.S. military development, 1996-2017
Scorecard 1: Chinese capability to attack air bases
Scorecard 2: air campaigns over Taiwan and the Spratly Islands
Scorecard 3: U.S. penetration of Chinese airspace
Scorecard 4: U.S. capability to attack Chinese air bases
Scorecard 5: Chinese anti-surface warfare
Scorecard 6: U.S. anti-surface warfare capabilities versus Chinese naval ships
Scorecard 7: U.S. counterspace capabilities versus Chinese space systems
Scorecard 8: Chinese counterspace capabilities versus U.S. space systems
Scorecard 9: U.S. and Chinese cyberwarfare capabilities
Scorecard 10: U.S. and Chinese strategic nuclear stability
The receding frontier of U.S. dominance
Implications and recommendations
Source of Description
Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher.
Available in Other Form
Print version: Heginbotham, Eric, author. U.S.-China military scorecard Santa Monica, CA : RAND, [2015]
Linked Resources
Record Appears in