College Students Should Be Allowed to Take Smart Drugs : a Debate / Intelligence2.
2015
Internet Access ARDC
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Linked e-resources
Details
Title
College Students Should Be Allowed to Take Smart Drugs : a Debate / Intelligence2.
Published
[Place of publication not identified] : Intelligence2, [2015]
Distributed
New York, N.Y. : Distributed by Films Media Group, 2016.
Copyright
©2015
Language
English
Language Note
Closed-captioned.
Description
1 online resource (1 video file (1 hr., 26 min., 33 sec.)) : color and sound
Call Number
Internet Access ARDC
Distributor No.
116090 Films Media Group
System Control No.
(OCoLC)956352073
Summary
If you could take a pill that would help you study and get better grades, would you? By helping to stay focused and alert for longer periods of time, college students are increasingly using off-label medication known as "smart drugs"--Pharmaceuticals designed to treat conditions like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), narcolepsy, and Alzheimer's. Is taking smart drugs appropriate, or is it a form of cheating? Should college students be allowed to take smart drugs?
Note
Originally released by Intelligence2, 2015.
Streaming video file encoded with permission for digital streaming by Films Media Group on June 09, 2016.
Title from distributor's description (Films Media Group, July 2, 2016).
Streaming video file encoded with permission for digital streaming by Films Media Group on June 09, 2016.
Title from distributor's description (Films Media Group, July 2, 2016).
Formatted Contents Note
Introduction: Intelligence Squared U.S. (1:22)
Debate "Housekeeping" (4:46)
Opening Statement For: Nita Farahany (6:42)
Opening Statement Against: Eric Racine (5:48)
Opening Statement For: Dr. Anjan Chatterjee (6:45)
Opening Statement Against: Nicole Vincent (6:45)
Inadequate Data (8:05)
Arm's Race of Medication (2:27)
Anti-Competition and Anti-Progress? (2:37)
Steroids Are Illegal in Sports (5:20)
QA: Social Economic Implications (6:17)
QA: What Is the Difference between Athletes and Students? (5:52)
QA: Inequality and Smart Drugs (2:09)
QA: How is Coffee Different than a Smart Drug? (4:11)
QA: Legalizing Smart Drugs (3:02)
Closing Argument For: Anjan Chatterjee (1:53)
Closing Argument Against: Eric Racine (1:28)
Closing Argument For: Nita Farahany (2:17)
Closing Argument Against: Nicole Vincent (2:21)
Time to Vote (4:07)
Audience Vote Results (1:06)
Credits: College Students Should Be Allowed to Take Smart Drugs: A Debate (0:55).
Debate "Housekeeping" (4:46)
Opening Statement For: Nita Farahany (6:42)
Opening Statement Against: Eric Racine (5:48)
Opening Statement For: Dr. Anjan Chatterjee (6:45)
Opening Statement Against: Nicole Vincent (6:45)
Inadequate Data (8:05)
Arm's Race of Medication (2:27)
Anti-Competition and Anti-Progress? (2:37)
Steroids Are Illegal in Sports (5:20)
QA: Social Economic Implications (6:17)
QA: What Is the Difference between Athletes and Students? (5:52)
QA: Inequality and Smart Drugs (2:09)
QA: How is Coffee Different than a Smart Drug? (4:11)
QA: Legalizing Smart Drugs (3:02)
Closing Argument For: Anjan Chatterjee (1:53)
Closing Argument Against: Eric Racine (1:28)
Closing Argument For: Nita Farahany (2:17)
Closing Argument Against: Nicole Vincent (2:21)
Time to Vote (4:07)
Audience Vote Results (1:06)
Credits: College Students Should Be Allowed to Take Smart Drugs: A Debate (0:55).
Audience
9 & up.
Digital File Characteristics
video file
Added Corporate Author
Linked Resources
Record Appears in