Worse than nothing : the dangerous fallacy of originalism / Erwin Chemerinsky.
2022
342.001 C517w 2022
Available at 3rd Floor
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Worse than nothing : the dangerous fallacy of originalism / Erwin Chemerinsky.
Author
ISBN
9780300259902 (hardcover)
0300259905 (hardcover)
9780300268485 (ePub ebook)
0300259905 (hardcover)
9780300268485 (ePub ebook)
Published
New Haven : Yale University Press, [2022]
Copyright
©2022
Language
English
Description
xiii, 248 pages ; 23 cm
Call Number
342.001 C517w 2022
System Control No.
(OCoLC)1310154267
Summary
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Three of the Supreme Court's nine justices explicitly embrace the originalist approach, as do increasing numbers of judges in the lower courts. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know what the "original intent" of any particular provision was. Perhaps worst of all, though its supporters tout it as a politically neutral and objective method, originalist interpretation tends to disappear when its results fail to conform to modern conservative ideology.
Note
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Three of the Supreme Court's nine justices explicitly embrace the originalist approach, as do increasing numbers of judges in the lower courts. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know what the "original intent" of any particular provision was. Perhaps worst of all, though its supporters tout it as a politically neutral and objective method, originalist interpretation tends to disappear when its results fail to conform to modern conservative ideology.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Formatted Contents Note
The rise of originalism
The allure of originalism
The epistemological problem
The incoherence problem
The abhorrence problem
The modernity problem
The hypocrisy problem
In defense of non-originalism
We should be afraid.
The allure of originalism
The epistemological problem
The incoherence problem
The abhorrence problem
The modernity problem
The hypocrisy problem
In defense of non-originalism
We should be afraid.
Available in Other Form
Online version : Chemerinsky, Erwin, Worse than nothing New Haven : Yale University Press, 2022
Record Appears in