Is Random Decision Making a Viable Solution for Replacing or Complementing Contemporary Selection and Election Processes?.
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Linked e-resources
Details
Title
Is Random Decision Making a Viable Solution for Replacing or Complementing Contemporary Selection and Election Processes?.
Published
[Place of publication not identified] : Latest Thinking, [date of publication not identified]
Language
English
Description
1 online resource (11 minutes)
Duration
001050
System Control No.
(OCoLC)1347652535
Summary
Throughout history sortition was often used as an election mechanism for public executive functions. Political systems such as Ancient Athens or Venice during the middle ages elected some of the executive positions by drawing lots. In the research presented in this video BRUNO S. FREY compares those methods with actual processes such as political elections or market decisions in order to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of this model. It shows that random mechanisms lead to more representative outcomes than elections and are effective in counteracting corruption.
Note
Title from resource description page (viewed August 24, 2020).
Digital File Characteristics
video file
Linked Resources
Record Appears in