Disciplinary discourses : social interactions in academic writing / Ken Hyland.
2004
302.2244 H996d 2004
Available at 3rd Floor
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Title
Disciplinary discourses : social interactions in academic writing / Ken Hyland.
Author
Edition
Michigan classics ed.
ISBN
0472030248 (pbk.)
9780472030248 (pbk.)
9780472030248 (pbk.)
Imprint
Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, c2004.
Language
English
Description
xiv, 211 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.
Call Number
302.2244 H996d 2004
System Control No.
(OCoLC)54882088
(OCoLC)54882088
(OCoLC)54882088
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. 194-207) and indexes.
Formatted Contents Note
Disciplinary cultures, texts and interactions
The importance of academic writing
The social creation of knowledge
Disciplinary cultures
Texts as social interaction
Approaches to academic interactions
Academic attribution: interaction through citation
Citation and intertextuality: some preliminaries
Citation signals
An overview of academic citation
Hard v soft knowledge and community practices
Contextualisation and the construction of knowledge
Agency and epistemology in citations
Ownership and membership in disciplinarity
Ethos and evaluation: the use of reporting verbs
Praise and criticism: interactions in book reviews
The book review genre
Evaluation in reviews
Dimensions of praise and criticism
Disciplinary differences in evaluations
Structural patterns of praise and criticism
Mitigation of evaluative acts
Speaking as an insider: promotion and credibility in abstracts
Texts, informants and methods
A move-structure classification of abstracts
Move-structure and rhetorical persuasion
Disciplinary differences in abstract structures
Claiming significance in abstracts
Claiming insider credibility
Evolving patterns: 1980-1997
Priority and prudence: the scientific letter
The letter genre
What are hedges and boosters?
Forms and frequencies of hedges and boosters
Circumspection and uncertainty: hedging in knowledge-making
Priority and solidarity: boosters in significance negotiation
Putting it together: hedges and boosters in letters.
The importance of academic writing
The social creation of knowledge
Disciplinary cultures
Texts as social interaction
Approaches to academic interactions
Academic attribution: interaction through citation
Citation and intertextuality: some preliminaries
Citation signals
An overview of academic citation
Hard v soft knowledge and community practices
Contextualisation and the construction of knowledge
Agency and epistemology in citations
Ownership and membership in disciplinarity
Ethos and evaluation: the use of reporting verbs
Praise and criticism: interactions in book reviews
The book review genre
Evaluation in reviews
Dimensions of praise and criticism
Disciplinary differences in evaluations
Structural patterns of praise and criticism
Mitigation of evaluative acts
Speaking as an insider: promotion and credibility in abstracts
Texts, informants and methods
A move-structure classification of abstracts
Move-structure and rhetorical persuasion
Disciplinary differences in abstract structures
Claiming significance in abstracts
Claiming insider credibility
Evolving patterns: 1980-1997
Priority and prudence: the scientific letter
The letter genre
What are hedges and boosters?
Forms and frequencies of hedges and boosters
Circumspection and uncertainty: hedging in knowledge-making
Priority and solidarity: boosters in significance negotiation
Putting it together: hedges and boosters in letters.
Record Appears in