Why philosophy matters for the study of religion--and vice versa / Thomas A. Lewis.
2015
210 L676w 2015
Available at 3rd Floor
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS | |
Title
Why philosophy matters for the study of religion--and vice versa / Thomas A. Lewis.
Author
Edition
First edition.
ISBN
9780198744740 (hardback)
0198744749
0198744749
Published
New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2015.
Language
English
Description
viii, 177 pages ; 23 cm
Call Number
210 L676w 2015
System Control No.
(OCoLC)930774317
(OCoLC)930774317
(OCoLC)930774317
Summary
Work in philosophy of religion is still strongly marked by an excessive focus on Christianity and, to a lesser extent, Judaism - almost to the exclusion of other religious traditions. Moreover, in many cases it has been confined to a narrow set of intellectual problems, without embedding these in their larger social, historical, and practical contexts. 'Why philosophy matters for the study of religion-and vice versa' addresses this situation through a series of interventions intended to work against the gap that exists between much scholarship in philosophy of religion and important recent developments that speak to religious studies as a whole. This volume takes up what, in recent years, has often been seen as a fundamental reason for excluding religious ethics and philosophy of religion from religious studies: their explicit normativity. Against this presupposition, Thomas A. Lewis argues that normativity is pervasive-not unique to ethics and philosophy of religion-and therefore not a reason to exclude them from religious studies. Lewis bridges more philosophical and historical subfields by arguing for the importance of history to the philosophy of religion.
Note
Work in philosophy of religion is still strongly marked by an excessive focus on Christianity and, to a lesser extent, Judaism - almost to the exclusion of other religious traditions. Moreover, in many cases it has been confined to a narrow set of intellectual problems, without embedding these in their larger social, historical, and practical contexts. 'Why philosophy matters for the study of religion-and vice versa' addresses this situation through a series of interventions intended to work against the gap that exists between much scholarship in philosophy of religion and important recent developments that speak to religious studies as a whole. This volume takes up what, in recent years, has often been seen as a fundamental reason for excluding religious ethics and philosophy of religion from religious studies: their explicit normativity. Against this presupposition, Thomas A. Lewis argues that normativity is pervasive-not unique to ethics and philosophy of religion-and therefore not a reason to exclude them from religious studies. Lewis bridges more philosophical and historical subfields by arguing for the importance of history to the philosophy of religion.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-171) and index.
Formatted Contents Note
Introduction: Mind the Gap: Or, Philosophy of Religioin and Religious Studies
Landscapes, Lacunae, and Prospects
On the Role of Normativity in Religious Studies
History in the Future of the Philosophy of Religion
Beyond Comparative Religious Ethics
Against Religious Literacy
Conclusion: Hegel or Nietzsche?
Landscapes, Lacunae, and Prospects
On the Role of Normativity in Religious Studies
History in the Future of the Philosophy of Religion
Beyond Comparative Religious Ethics
Against Religious Literacy
Conclusion: Hegel or Nietzsche?
Record Appears in